I find this arrival of a new commentator rather odd.. as if there's somebody trying to make a point about "trolling". I'm not sure.
In any case, it's exploded into a huge amount of spam and incoherent rants the likes of which I've never seen before. I wouldn't bother trying to argue with it, unless you have a lot of time and nothing better to do. It's seems to favor the style of posting numerous rants, one right after the other... total devoid of substance.
Did Doug send you here to see if I would ban you, thus justifying his own bans of liberal commentators? That's the thought that popped into my head.
But clearly, this person is.. way way out there. As I said.. substantive argument is fine. You can even call me names. Much beyond that and I'll just delete it all.
7 comments:
Because you're not smart enough to respond? What happened to the Fairness Doctrine you dweebs are always whining about?
Gosh, I'm disappointed that you would CENSOR COMMENTS!
But then, it's always one-sided with you libtards.
I'll have to go through the posts again, because there was something I wanted to say about 'slogans'...but I want to put it on the correct post, your highness libtardship.
Ha, that would be funny, Tom, if you finally got sick of the stuff enough that it made you understand Doug's analogy that his blog is his house.
All I can do is laugh. Worstnightmare, keep it coming. Funny stuff to see Tom shitting his pants over this.
Shitting my pants? I just don't want my blog spammed by numerous useless comments.
That means I'm shitting my pants?
If you have ever glimpsed Steve Laws blog, you might realize why he is as paranoid and inane as he is...
More quotable material? I'll have a look.
Post a Comment