Every single comment from the talking heads regarding Scott McClellan's book is centered around McClellan's motivation, and questions surrounding why McClellan didn't resign if he was uncomfortable with the way the administration governed.
Nobody is talking about the substance of what McCLellan said, if he's right, and what that means if he is. Well.. except for Glenn Greenwald and some other writers on the left.
Why is there a complete lack of substantive debate in our elite discourse?
No comments:
Post a Comment