Why is it that liberals believe (as in Keith's statements regarding Novak) that it is a black and white world - Left vs. Right. So, because he doesn't fully agree, and based on that Bush's people decided to remove him from their list (which is their business) it means they threw him under the bus? Come on! Like Novak, I do not blindly agree with all things Bush - yet the blind, mindless liberal following of Pelosi and Billary is mind-numbing. Disagreeing with Bush on some issues does not mean I agree with you. It means I have a separate opinion that I feel deserves consideration. Honestly, few politicians are all things to me. No one can be all things to all people, nor should they try. Do I agree with all things Bush? Of course not. Does that make me less of a Republican? Absolutely not. It means, unlike the Liberal Zombies of far left socialism, I have an independent mind. Oh, and Mrs. Pistachio's errors on the blog while I was away (as you so aptly pointed out in your normal, hateful manner) was due simply to 1) inexperience with blogging 2) nervousnous and 3) she apparently failed to explain that she was a pre-school and kindergarten teacher which is hardly one the is capable of affecting one's ability to spell for their lifetime as you insinuate in previous posts. Should she have been a little more careful with her spelling? Sure. But come on, this isn't a term paper. It's a blog. And unlike you, we spend only a short time of the day on the net. We have responsibilities that take up the remainder of the day. Nice to see that some things don't change. Your venom and hatefulness (a typical Liberal characteristic if I say so myself - based on my own observations, of course) is consistent and unchanging. That's why I was so surprised that the last time you dared comment on my site it was not venomous, disruptive or hateful. It was a well thought out comment articulated in a manner that added to the discussion. Notice, it wasn't deleted and for that reason. That's where you miss it. I don't delete disagreements. I delete disruption. God Bless.
Kids in general will spell and write the same way they speak, and they learn to speak at a very young age where the brain is more suceptable(sp?) to that kind of development.
Kindergarten teachers actually have an amazingly powerful influence over a childs future due to them teaching children key skills at a very influential time in their life. Discounting her impact I think would be greivous. She impacts children, for better or worse, in a very real way.
She impacts children, for better or worse, in a very real way.
And that's the point. More than that, I focus on hypocrisy, because it makes me crazy. For example, Dan could murder the language and I wouldn't say much of anything because he's not writing posts about how to raise kids whilst being a (former) teacher, and simultaneously displaying one of the most horrying traits that cause problems in later life - mastery of the language... or lack thereof.
I'm going to write extensively about all of this on Monday.. after I do my "real" work, such as it is.. and one of the central themes is the habit Doug has of doing exactly what he accuses me of, without even knowing it.
What is more "hateful" (as Douggie likes to call it).
"Liberals are anti-American traitors that hate the troops"
Or..
"Go fuck yourself you stupid right wing Jebus blowing asshole"
6 comments:
Why is it that liberals believe (as in Keith's statements regarding Novak) that it is a black and white world - Left vs. Right. So, because he doesn't fully agree, and based on that Bush's people decided to remove him from their list (which is their business) it means they threw him under the bus? Come on! Like Novak, I do not blindly agree with all things Bush - yet the blind, mindless liberal following of Pelosi and Billary is mind-numbing. Disagreeing with Bush on some issues does not mean I agree with you. It means I have a separate opinion that I feel deserves consideration. Honestly, few politicians are all things to me. No one can be all things to all people, nor should they try. Do I agree with all things Bush? Of course not. Does that make me less of a Republican? Absolutely not. It means, unlike the Liberal Zombies of far left socialism, I have an independent mind. Oh, and Mrs. Pistachio's errors on the blog while I was away (as you so aptly pointed out in your normal, hateful manner) was due simply to 1) inexperience with blogging 2) nervousnous and 3) she apparently failed to explain that she was a pre-school and kindergarten teacher which is hardly one the is capable of affecting one's ability to spell for their lifetime as you insinuate in previous posts. Should she have been a little more careful with her spelling? Sure. But come on, this isn't a term paper. It's a blog. And unlike you, we spend only a short time of the day on the net. We have responsibilities that take up the remainder of the day. Nice to see that some things don't change. Your venom and hatefulness (a typical Liberal characteristic if I say so myself - based on my own observations, of course) is consistent and unchanging. That's why I was so surprised that the last time you dared comment on my site it was not venomous, disruptive or hateful. It was a well thought out comment articulated in a manner that added to the discussion. Notice, it wasn't deleted and for that reason. That's where you miss it. I don't delete disagreements. I delete disruption. God Bless.
href="http://www.fugly.com/videos/6039/bush-state-of-the-union-address.html a video of what Bush really wanted to say.
Thanks for stopping by Doug.. good stuff.. I haven't written a long "quote and pummel" post in a while. That one will keep me busy for a while.
Im going to quote Doug in what I beleive to be a very accurate sense
Doug said: Don't generalize about Conservatives while I generalize about Liberals being "far left socialist zombies."
I almost couldn't see that post through all the hypocracy in the air.
However, I can quote Tom directly as saying "Can anyone be all things to all people? Should it even try?"
Oh, and as far as the education thing goes:
Kids in general will spell and write the same way they speak, and they learn to speak at a very young age where the brain is more suceptable(sp?) to that kind of development.
Kindergarten teachers actually have an amazingly powerful influence over a childs future due to them teaching children key skills at a very influential time in their life. Discounting her impact I think would be greivous. She impacts children, for better or worse, in a very real way.
She impacts children, for better or worse, in a very real way.
And that's the point. More than that, I focus on hypocrisy, because it makes me crazy. For example, Dan could murder the language and I wouldn't say much of anything because he's not writing posts about how to raise kids whilst being a (former) teacher, and simultaneously displaying one of the most horrying traits that cause problems in later life - mastery of the language... or lack thereof.
I'm going to write extensively about all of this on Monday.. after I do my "real" work, such as it is.. and one of the central themes is the habit Doug has of doing exactly what he accuses me of, without even knowing it.
What is more "hateful" (as Douggie likes to call it).
"Liberals are anti-American traitors that hate the troops"
Or..
"Go fuck yourself you stupid right wing Jebus blowing asshole"
?
To me, it's obvious.. Doug hasn't a clue..
Post a Comment