The Parsing of the Loon

Douglas V. Gibbs said...
Why is it that liberals believe (as in Keith's statements regarding Novak) that it is a black and white world - Left vs. Right.

That, coming from a guy that has no nuance what-so-ever in anything he writes. Doug believes that "conservatives" are "America-loving patriots", while liberals are "anti-American traitors", and "Christianity" is the only true religion, and everyone else is going to hell - oh.. and Muslims are out to kill everyone in the world or convert them to Islam.

Everything that Doug "believes" is Left vs. Right, and it's the constant war he fights on his blog every day.

So, because he doesn't fully agree, and based on that Bush's people decided to remove him from their list (which is their business) it means they threw him under the bus? Come on! Like Novak, I do not blindly agree with all things Bush - yet the blind, mindless liberal following of Pelosi and Billary is mind-numbing.

I can't recall Doug writing anything negative about Bush, other than perhaps the immigration bill.

Here's a little factoid that might explain Bush's point of view;

Latin American immigrants and their U.S. born offspring, already constitute America's largest minority group at 14 percent. By 2030, they are projected to account for nearly one-fourth of the U.S. population.

That demographic votes overwhelmingly Democratic. Tom DeLay once spoke of a "permanent Republican majority". Duh...

Still, Hillary was booed at the DKos convention last week when she gave a speech. Liberals are upset at Pelosi for caving on the wiretapping bill a couple weeks ago. Unlike Doug, and the vast majority of conservatives, we do hold our own politicians to the same standards as anyone else. Do you know who Joe Lieberman is? A FORMER Democrat that we kicked the fuck out of our party for being a total tool.

Disagreeing with Bush on some issues does not mean I agree with you. It means I have a separate opinion that I feel deserves consideration. Honestly, few politicians are all things to me. No one can be all things to all people, nor should they try. Do I agree with all things Bush? Of course not. Does that make me less of a Republican? Absolutely not. It means, unlike the Liberal Zombies of far left socialism, I have an independent mind.

How could he possibly write that with a straight face? Independent mind? Are you fucking kidding me?

Every last post is text-book right wing fear bombs. Fear of the Islamic boogey man. Fear of the Mexicans. Fear of the homos. Fear of the godless heathens trying to take away his religious "rights".

I notice that Doug has started sourcing some of his factual assertions. Remember him accusing me of referencing "left wing propaganda"? Take a gander at what he's sourcing with;

Newsmax
Worldnet Daily
Townhall

These are not "news" organizations. They are right wing propaganda outlets masquerading as news organizations. There is no equivalent on the left.

Oh, and Mrs. Pistachio's errors on the blog while I was away (as you so aptly pointed out in your normal, hateful manner) was due simply to 1) inexperience with blogging 2) nervousnous and 3) she apparently failed to explain that she was a pre-school and kindergarten teacher which is hardly one the is capable of affecting one's ability to spell for their lifetime as you insinuate in previous posts.

The medium has nothing to do with the written word, and you know that. She obviously lacks knowledge of basic English grammar. Again, many people are in the same boat, but teaching kids at their most formative years and not being able to correctly formulate a sentence is horrible. How did she get certified? I have no idea what the standards are, but I would think passing an English exam would be one of them.

Jesus H. Christ on toast.. here's a comment posted on Doug's blog about Michael Vick.

when a man assumes public trust, he becomes public property.
Tommy Jefferson.
I keep that in my classroom to remind me I am who this children look to.
That fact also keeps alot of friends awake at night.
obob | Homepage | 07.27.07 - 6:38 pm | #

Tommy Jefferson? What the fuck? His comment is barely legible, the grammar is such a fucking train wreck.

I am who this children look to. ???

And "alot" is not a fucking word.. okay? It's "a lot".

That idiot is teaching a class? Holy fuck.

Should she have been a little more careful with her spelling? Sure. But come on, this isn't a term paper. It's a blog. And unlike you, we spend only a short time of the day on the net. We have responsibilities that take up the remainder of the day.

That has nothing to do with understanding basic grammar rules. Again, I normally don't care about spelling errors or tweaks in the language. The hypocrisy is the point.

Nice to see that some things don't change. Your venom and hatefulness (a typical Liberal characteristic if I say so myself - based on my own observations, of course) is consistent and unchanging.

Every time you call millions of Americans "traitors", your vile evil is multiplied exponentially. Every post on your shitbag of a blog is filled with "venom and hatefulness", but you simply phrase it without the "vulgar" words I like to use... you stupid fuck.

You think you take some sort of high road because you don't use the same sort of language I do? Well, stupid fuck, language has nothing to do with the central argument that you are making. You can phrase your opinion like a Sunday homily, and it can still be vile. And in your twisted mind, you think you are doing the world a service when your political views are designed to do only one thing; hurt other people.

Seriously.. go read his blog. There is not one single advocacy on the entire thing that would benefit people. It's all hate, war and violence, and central to every post is fear. The right wing has not a god damn solid argument to make that can't exist independent of scaring you.

Every word you write is designed to cause harm to some specific group of people. Every last bit of it. It could be Muslims, gays, Mexicans, atheists, women, Europeans, and on and on.

So, go pull your trigger on some women and kids Doug.. you sick fucker.

That's why I was so surprised that the last time you dared comment on my site it was not venomous, disruptive or hateful. It was a well thought out comment articulated in a manner that added to the discussion. Notice, it wasn't deleted and for that reason. That's where you miss it. I don't delete disagreements. I delete disruption. God Bless.

The writing style that I used in that thread was the exact same thing I did from the first comment I left on your hate-fest of a blog, because I know the f-bomb makes you shit your pants. I was excoriated by your loon brigade, called names, ridiculed.. and still I kept the tone in check for the most part. Then you simply deleted my comments because I made you look like a tool. Hell, you still won't debate me on any topic because you're afraid.. hence it's easier to delete it all. I'm quite sure you left my comments on your blog only because you didn't like me calling you a hypocritical coward.

"Dared comment"? Fuck you.. I wasn't daring a fucking thing, just correcting your slander of a post, that once again mischaracterized the viewpoint of mainstream liberals. I hadn't done that in a while because it would be a waste of time. You're quick on the delete key.

So, it wasn't me "disrupting" your fucking blog. Complete fucking retards like Phil were doing that well enough.