tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9996771.post3617520821044073869..comments2023-10-24T09:44:31.894-05:00Comments on The Infidel Express: 172 IQ, Bitches!Tomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17564526640395324075noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9996771.post-21942174887498534802010-08-21T01:22:29.934-05:002010-08-21T01:22:29.934-05:00Virtually every post is a strawman. He loves to ma...Virtually every post is a strawman. He loves to make up what Liberal ideology espouses, and then argue against that as opposed to what anyone is actually saying. This is why he paraphrases constantly.<br /><br />The annoying part is that he thinks he's making a convincing argument using that method, whilst simultaneously claiming the moral high-ground.<br /><br />Honest to god.. he thinks that completely making shit up, not quoting or linking anything, and then arguing against it is the more ethical approach to political debate.<br /><br />Either that, or he realizes that he's just too fucking stupid to argue against points that people are actually making. <br /><br />I'm not really sure which is true.Tomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17564526640395324075noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9996771.post-86673758881569956762010-08-20T17:03:45.301-05:002010-08-20T17:03:45.301-05:00he does like the strawman - and even where his arg...he does like the strawman - and even where his arguments are intelligible, they are nevertheless incomprehensible.<br /><br />The arrogance is astounding. He and he know-nothing pals know more about the constitution than Scalia J himself. <br /><br />Mind you, they love Thomas J - that guy really knows what he's talking about. Ok, maybe he doesn't say much on the bench, but he really tears up affirmative action!<br /><br />http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202421827466<br /><br />stoopid is as stoopid does. If only someone would just recognise his genius...krishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01984620763250118501noreply@blogger.com